|
 |
Peter G. Makaroff, QC, Canada's First Doukhobor Lawyer
by
William H. McConnell
Peter G. Makaroff
(1895-1970) came to Canada as a young boy with the Doukhobor migration in
1899. At that time, he could speak no English, but in less than twenty
years, he became the first Doukhobor ever to graduate from a post-secondary
educational institution. He went on to become one of Canada's outstanding
lawyers as well as a noted peacemaker and humanitarian. Throughout his life,
he cherished his ties with his Russian culture, Doukhobor heritage and
pacifist roots. He was a model to many Doukhobors as an educated, courageous
and intelligent professional who was willing to help the underdog locally,
nationally and internationally. The following article by William H.
McConnell, reproduced by permission from Saskatchewan History (44,
1992, No. 3), traces the life and career of this Doukhobor role model who was always
at his best working uphill against apparently impossible odds.
Peter
G. Makaroff, whose family came to Canada with the first wave of Doukhobor
immigration in 1899, was a pioneer in more ways than one. Brought to Canada
from Transcaucasia at age five, with six brothers and sisters, after
graduation in law from the University of Saskatchewan in 1918, he became the
world's first Doukhobor lawyer. He was the first member of his religion to
serve on the University's Board of Governors and to preside over the
Saskatchewan Labour Relations Board. In addition to his distinguished record
of public service, he was also the founding member of one of Saskatoon's
principal law firms.
Peter's father, Gregory, found communal life in the Doukhobor colony, which
was ruled so strictly by Peter V. Verigin, to be oppressive and left to
become an independent farmer. The migration of such dissidents gained
momentum with more than a thousand "Independents" residing in the Prince
Albert district shortly after 1908. While they still adhered to the main
tenets of their faith, and continued to be fervent pacifists, the
Independents rejected the authoritarian governmental structure of their
leaders and abandoned the communal way of life. In 1916 the Society of
Independent Doukhobors was organized with Peter soon becoming secretary of
the new group. "Without adopting any of the pretensions of the leaders," a
leading work declares of the younger Makaroff, "he became the intellectual
guide to those Doukhobors who had chosen the path of opposition to Peter
Verigin but were not prepared to abandon entirely their loyalties to the
sect."
 |
|
Doukhobor children brought to Pennsylvania by the Quakers in 1902 for education.
Peter Markaroff appears in the front centre (with cap). Swarthmore College Collection. |
As an independent farmer in the Blaine Lake district of Saskatchewan,
Gregory Makaroff sent his children to the German-English Academy (later
Rosthern Junior College) at Rosthern, which was located about twenty-five
miles distant from the farm. Peter's early inspiration came from one of his
teachers, Professor Michael Sherbinin, a Russian nobleman from St.
Petersburg, fluent in several languages, from another teacher, Ella Martin,
a Presbyterian, from George McCraney, Liberal MP for Rosthern, and from Sir
Wilfrid Laurier, who was both prime minister and a distinguished lawyer. The
Quakers (a community of whom resided near Borden) provided financial
assistance for the education of young Doukhobors, and Peter was sent to
Philadelphia to continue his schooling among them, later enrolling in the
College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Saskatchewan. By that time
Peter Verigin had taken half of the original Doukhobor community in
Saskatchewan to the Kootenay area of British Columbia where he had bought
15,000 acres of land.
But who were the Doukhobors of whom the Makaroffs were members? There was no
formal ministry nor sacraments within the Doukhobor religion, which broke
away from the Russian Orthodox Church in the early eighteenth century.
Adherents held that God dwelt within all his children, and that formal
communion, preaching or prayers were unnecessary. One writer has described
their religion as follows:
The Doukhobors were a priestless religious group, whose faith centred on the
belief that every man carried within him the Divine Spark of the Holy
Spirit. The Doukhobors were pacifists who believed that each person was a
temple of the Holy Spirit. The destruction of human life was therefore
regarded as a grievous sin. Their belief in the presence of the Holy Spirit
led to their reliance on expressions of the Spirit (prophecies, worshipful
praise and song) rather than on the written word. By the 1800s, a heritage
of psalms and prayers, called the Living Book, was passed on orally from
generation to generation.
With women and men separated by a central aisle in their unadorned meeting
houses, believers would make simple professions of faith, much as the
Quakers did elsewhere, along with reciting psalms and singing hymns. When
Peter Makaroffs family and others destroyed their firearms in 1895, refused
to be conscripted into the Army and resolved never to go to war, they
experienced ostracism and persecution. The pacifistic character of the
religion, emphasizing non-violence and universal brotherhood, brought them
into collision with the Russian Orthodox Church and the Tsarist bureaucracy.
The demands of the faith presented a hard test to many Doukhobors and not
all of them remained steadfast, with some relapsing into the Russian
mainstream.
The elder Verigin, a man of impressive charm and presence, known to his
flock as "Peter the Lordly," succeeded his mentor, Lukeria V. Kalmykova, as
leader of the Doukhobors on her death in 1886. The military conscription
policy, which was so contrary to their principles, having been introduced
more than a decade earlier in Russia proper, was unexpectedly extended to
the Caucasus region in 1887. In the same year, Verigin was exiled to
Shenkursk, Siberia, where he met with other refugees and was deeply
influenced by Leo Tolstoy's philosophical anarchism, which was infused with
a vein of non-doctrinal Christian pacifism very similar to that of the
Doukhobors. Verigin increasingly promoted Tolstoyan tenets among his
followers, advocating "non-resistance to evil," and enjoining them not to
swear oaths, eat meat, drink, smoke, or submit to military conscription.
After further persecution, the Tsarist government finally gave the
Doukhobors permission to emigrate to Canada, in which they were assisted by
royalties from their benefactor, Leo Tolstoy, derived from the sale of his
novel, Resurrection, published in 1898. The Russian authorities admonished
them that they, alone, would be responsible for their travelling expenses,
that those (including Peter Verigin) who had been exiled to Siberia, or who
had been called up for military service should finish their terms before
leaving, and warned them that if they returned they would be banished to
Siberia. The Canadian government, which was then implementing the "Sifton
immigration policy" to populate the West, was grateful to receive as
immigrants such hardworking agricultural settlers and as a concession to
their religious scruples passed an Order-in-Council and a consequential
statutory provision exempting them from future military service.
Some 7,500 Doukhobors then congregated at the Georgian port of Batum,
departing for Canada in four shiploads over a seven-month period, the first
immigrants embarking on the S.S. Lake Huron in late December, 1898. The fare
to Winnipeg was twenty-two dollars for each passenger. After the arduous
transits to Halifax and Saint John, New Brunswick, the new arrivals went
overland to colonies in the Yorkton area of Assiniboia and the Duck Lake
area of Saskatchewan, to a reservation of homestead land having an aggregate
total of 773,400 acres. Their leader, Peter V. Verigin, arrived in Canada
only on 16 December 1902, after completing nearly sixteen years of Siberian
exile.
Because of the young Makaroff’s command of Russian, he was frequently in
demand as a translator in Saskatchewan courts, which served a polyglot
community arriving in the province before the First World War. Once, when
Judge J.A. McClean of the Battleford District Court refused to allow a
Doukhobor to take an oath, allegedly because the sect was not Christian and
did not believe in the Bible, Makaroff, who was present, jumped to his feet
and, proclaiming himself to be a Doukhobor, asserted that his
co-religionists were indeed Christians, and that although it was against
their principles to swear oaths, the witness could make an affirmation if
allowed to do so. McClean sternly admonished Makaroff to sit down, asking
him to speak to him after the court adjourned. Afterwards the judge spoke
very softly and kindly to the young man, admitting that he personally knew
few Doukhobors and encouraging Peter to become a lawyer to promote better
understanding. Makaroff did study law at the University of Saskatchewan,
graduating in 1918. He helped to defray expenses by waiting on tables in the
residences, and participated extensively in athletics. He also got to know
well another law student and future prime minister, John Diefenbaker, who
graduated one year later. The two remained friendly although their political
philosophies diverged sharply as time wore on. Another acquaintance, Helen
Marshall, a non-Doukhobor who graduated in arts and science in the same year
that Makaroff graduated in law, two years later became his wife.
 |
|
Peter Makaroff in University of Saskatchewan football uniform, 1916. Saskatchewan Archives Board, S-B6510. |
Prior to his death, Judge McClean had given instructions that his extensive
law library be sold to his young acquaintance, as a result of which Makaroff
acquired a valuable reference library for five hundred dollars. He began his
professional practice in the Canada Building in Saskatoon in July, 1918, and
was soon taking cases to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of
Canada. A year later he was joined by Arthur L. Bates, the firm practicing
under the style of Makaroff and Bates until the Second World War period.
Because of the Doukhobors' preference for a simple life close to nature and
their aversion to "worldly" education and the learned professions,
Makaroff’s admission to the Bar was unprecedented in his religious community
and he was sometimes described as the first certified professional in the
sect's two hundred and fifty year history. Far from this estranging him from
his fellow believers, he was admired by most Doukhobors for his educational
qualifications and marked legal abilities, and they often turned to him for
advice, especially during recurrent crises. Although his legal practice was
a cosmopolitan one, he always sought to help his own community whenever he
could and was only the first of many Doukhobors to attend the University of
Saskatchewan.
In one of his earlier cases, Prescesky v. Can. Nor. Ry., decided in 1923, Makaroff’s talent for cross-examination was apparent. His client, a young
farmer, had been run down by the defendant's locomotive at a level railway
crossing, with counsel for the railway arguing that the train had given the
required signal for such crossings - two long and two short blasts of the
whistle with continuous ringing of the bell for each crossing - before the
accident took place. Makaroff’s client was non-suited at the first trial,
but the Supreme Court of Canada ordered a new trial at which the sole point
in contention was whether the requisite warning had been given. Railway
counsel from Winnipeg sought to reinforce his already-strong evidence by
calling the section foreman's wife, who claimed that she could survey from
her back porch railway track for a distance of four miles, including the
site of the accident. Makaroff did not believe that she had actually seen
the accident, and proceeded to cross-examine on that assumption. His
strategy was risky, however, and could backfire, since if he were mistaken
she might take the opportunity to further confirm her evidence. Makaroff
decided to test her on the critical question:
Q. You say you actually stood there and heard the whistle blow four times,
from the time it passed your cottage until it stopped at the accident?
A. Yes, I did.
Q. Once for each crossing?
A. Sure, that's just what I said.
Q. You mean you heard four blasts?
A. That is right.
Q. One blast for each of the four crossings?
A. Yes, that's exactly what I said. That's just what I heard. |
The young counsel for the plaintiff then saw the jury smile and whisper to
each other. His successful client later moved from Saskatoon to Vancouver,
where he entered commercial life and acquired a substantial fortune.
In the early days of Makaroff’s legal career, public opinion in the province
was often intolerant of immigrants of Central and East European origin, and
in this respect the Law Society was no different from other organizations.
On 30 June 1930, for example, Luseland barrister Frank E. Jaenicke wrote
Makaroff referring to a recent entry in the Law Society Gazette stating,
"efforts should be made to limit those entering the legal profession to
persons of British extraction." Mr. Jaenicke added that most of the names of
those reprimanded or struck off the rolls for non-ethical conduct were of
non-British origin, and he suspected that "most of the Benchers were
Tories." Makaroff replied that "at the Bar Convention here the same matter
was brought up by [former Dean of Law Arthur] Moxon, seconded by [Stewart]
McKercher, but before the motion was put, Mr. [H. E.] Sampson, who was the
only Bencher present, got up on his feet, and tendered a very lame apology
for the action of the Benchers. He gave the assurance that everything
possible would be done... to correct the unfavourable impression." A
weakened motion was then passed by the Bar convention urging rectification
of the matter as soon as possible." Later in the same letter Makaroff added
"... I do not give a penny for the attitude of the members of the profession
towards me, but I do object to that spirit or sentiment being shared by the
judiciary, which undoubtedly will be, unless something happens in the
immediate future to check the tendency" In a further letter he mentioned the
need for more "broad-minded and tolerant" Benchers, suggesting that more
influence might be exerted by lawyers of like mind to elect such Benchers at
the next Law Society election.
The Canadian authorities became increasingly critical of a small breakaway
sect, the Sons of Freedom, which had formed soon after the Doukhobors
arrived in Canada and the activities of which were not representative of a
substantial majority of the members of the religion:
However exotic the more violent actions of the Sons of Freedom, the zealot
wing of the Doukhobors, may appear to us, it is sobering to reflect that
none of these extreme types of behaviour—nudism, arson, dynamiting—was part
of the Doukhobor pattern of life before the sect reached Canada.
Fire-raisers and nude paraders have never represented more than a small
majority of an otherwise peaceful (indeed pacifist) community, anxious only
to live according to its own beliefs.
In practice, however, nice logical distinctions between the mainstream
Doukhobor movement and the Sons of Freedom were not always made. The
peaceful majority were often confused by the public with their more zealous
coreligionists, and suffered persecution along with the minority.
With the election of Conservative leader, Dr. J.T.M. Anderson, to the
premiership in 1929, increasing strife developed between the Saskatchewan
government and the local Doukhobor community. Between 1929 and 1931,
twenty-five Saskatchewan schools were burned in Doukhobor areas around
Kamsack and Canora, resulting in some arrests and imprisonments. Coincident
with the arson and civil disobedience, plummeting world wheat prices
adversely affected the communal economy, creating a mood of demoralization
among Doukhobors which tended to increase the unrest.
In October 1924, the life of the elder Verigin had come to an untimely end
when he and eight others were blown up in a railway carriage near Grand
Forks, British Columbia. The mystery of his death has never been solved.
Difficult adjustments were necessary after the arrival of Verigin’s son,
Peter P. Verigin, from the USSR in 1927. The new leader was described by
Makaroff as something of an enigma:
|
"...No one was sure whether he was a saint or devil or just a plain madman.
He was very brilliant. He had a tremendous memory, but at the same time I
think he was really a psychopath. From the day he arrived from Russia he
became involved in one litigation after another. He was in and out of jail
for assaults, for creating disturbances, for what not. He was quite an
alcoholic and when under the influence of liquor he was absolutely beyond
control. His headquarters were at Verigin near Yorkton. He became so rowdy
when staying in one hotel after another that he would be chucked out of
there and not allowed to come back, so he goes to work and builds his own
hotel. He wasn't there on more than one occasion before he was prohibited
from going back into his own hotel." |
Dr. Anderson and Conservative Prime Minister, R.B. Bennett, were persuaded
that Peter P. Verigin was the source of much of the trouble affecting the
Doukhobors and decided to take action. In 1932 Verigin had been sentenced to
eighteen months in the Prince Albert penitentiary for perjury and tampering
with a witness in a disputed land sale agreement the previous year. They
decided to spirit him out of Canada with the least publicity possible.
Neither Bennett nor Anderson had much sympathy for immigrants of non-British
origin, particularly those who might be tinged with "radical sympathies" or
were deemed to have engaged in political agitation against the state.
Enacted by Borden's Union Government during the Red Scare of 1919, section
98 of the Criminal Code visited with up to twenty years' imprisonment
members of vaguely-defined "unlawful associations," one of whose purposes
was to bring about political change by unlawful means. Pursuant to Bennett's
policy "of having 'no truck nor trade' with the Soviet Union, and placing an
'iron heel' on Socialism and Communism," the notorious trial of the Toronto
Communists (several of whom had Slavic names) was held in November 1931,
with the above provision being described by McGill law professor, Frank R.
Scott, as "unequalled in the history of Canada and probably any British
country for centuries past," for its permanent restriction of civil
liberties. One of the first acts of the succeeding Mackenzie King
administration, in fact, was to repeal the egregious section 98.
Among
other illiberal acts, Prime Minister Bennett had also amended the Criminal
Code to raise the penalty for parading while nude to three years'
imprisonment, a measure obviously aimed at the Doukhobors, and amended the
Dominion Franchise Act in 1934 so as to deprive Doukhobors in British
Columbia of the right to vote in federal elections. For his part, in
1929-1930, Premier Anderson advised the federal government that further
Russian and Mennonite immigration into the province was not wanted, adding
that he "doubted if these 5,000 people really were starving outside the
gates of Moscow," as claimed. His government also abolished the use of the
French language in grade one of the public schools. It was in this era that
the Ku Klux Klan was active in Saskatchewan, with the premier extolling the
value of "British" immigration and institutions, a point which the Klan made
in a less refined manner.
Thus, Bennett and Anderson being in accord in the final days of January,
1933, two plainclothes agents from Ottawa arrived in Prince Albert, showed
the warden a document pardoning Verigin, and whisked the latter swiftly and
silently away to Halifax. Anderson and Bennett obviously wished to speed the
Doukhobor leader out of the country before his followers and legal counsel
could intervene on his behalf.
This ploy almost succeeded. By chance, however, the Prince Albert
correspondent of the Saskatoon Star-Phoenix learned of the impending
deportation and telephoned her city editor, who in turn telephoned a
startled Makaroff; when the latter spoke to Verigin's subordinates they were
insistent that no effort or expense be spared to save their leader from
deportation.
Neither Prime Minister Bennett nor the immigration authorities would accede
to Makaroff’s request to hold Verigin in Winnipeg so that he could interview
his client. With time elapsing quickly, the situation was becoming
desperate. Makaroff then embarked on a bold chase. He took the train to
Winnipeg and then travelled by air to Minneapolis, Chicago, New York and
Boston. Finding that there were no flights between Boston and Halifax, he
chartered a small private plane which took off at three o'clock in the
morning of the day that Verigin was to be deported, flying over the Bay of
Fundy without instruments. The pilot flew at a high altitude in order to
avoid the treacherous downdrafts in the area and, fortunately, the flight
proceeded without incident.
 |
|
Russian postcard sent to
John G. Bondoreff by S. Reibin and Peter Makaroff written in flight, 2 February
1933. "In view of the fact that Petyushka will be sent off the morning of 4
February and in order to see him before deportation, [we]...are flying at 130
miles per hour..."
Saskatchewan Archives
Board, S-A292. |
Makaroff arrived in Halifax on Saturday morning shortly before the S.S.
Montcalm was scheduled to depart with Verigin for Russia. He met with a
frigid reception when he was brought to Verigin's cell. Since Verigin had
previously threatened to end his life, Makaroff approached the interview
with some uneasiness. The Doukhobor chieftain did not appear surprised at
seeing his former counsel with two other Doukhobors, but as Peter Makaroff
described the encounter later to John G. Bondoreff, one of the leader's
aides: "The minute he saw the three of us as he entered the room, he
immediately swung around and ran back to his cell. The officer in charge
came back and said that he would not see the other two at all but wanted to
speak to me."
Because of Verigin's death threat, Makaroff was surprised by
his relatively cordial behavior towards him. He attributed Verigin's
"frequently offensive and insulting attitude" towards those around him to
his hopelessness at remaining in the country, noting particularly his
incivility towards Lionel Ryan, one of Makaroff’s Halifax agents.
At first
Verigin advised Makaroff that he wanted no help at all, cursing all those
responsible for the belated legal intervention. There was, moreover, little
time to confer. It was already eleven o'clock and the Court House, where
habeas corpus proceedings (ie. proceedings to determine whether a
prisoner has been imprisoned lawfully) were to be instituted, was to close in two hours.
In these difficult circumstances, Makaroff was able to have the hearing
deferred until late February. There was at least a reprieve!
When his counsel asked Verigin whether, in lieu of deportation, he would
prefer to go back to Prince Albert to finish the remainder of his jail
sentence, he was met with "a long line of profanity to the effect that he
had no fear of Canadian jails whatsoever. I interpreted that as instructions
to do all I could to save him and told him I would do that. He pretended not
to care, but his appearance contradicted his pretence." Following this
exchange, Makaroff related that Verigin "gave me every cooperation... to
present his case before the Court," adding, however, "... it would be
impossible to describe in any detail his many insane tantrums... during our
month's stay there"
After these rather equivocal instructions to counsel, Makaroff applied for
habeas corpus on his client's behalf. Much of the argument before Mr.
Justice Mellish centred around the instrument dated 20 January 1933, and
signed by the Governor-General, Lord Bessborough, which read in part: "He is
to be deported to Russia when released from custody... ." The relevant
section of the Immigration Act, however, provided that an inmate could be
deported only after his sentence or term of imprisonment "has expired," and Mellish held that Verigin's sentence had not "expired" within the meaning of
that section. Roughly half of Verigin's sentence had still to run and "he
has the right if he chooses to take the limit of time allowed him before
deportation.... If the prisoner is pardoned conditionally he has the right
to refuse the pardon if he is unwilling to accept the conditions. If the
prisoner has been pardoned (and I do not think he could be discharged from
prison except in exercise of the power of pardon) he cannot in my opinion be
deported." Since Verigin had been unlawfully detained, Mellish ordered that
his petition be granted and that he be released from custody.
Had the case been heard a few weeks later it is probable that the results
would have been different. Verigin was a very fortunate man. One month after
Mellish's decision, the Supreme Court of Canada decided, contrary to the
Nova Scotia judgment, that the prerogative of mercy could be exercised by
the Crown to release a prisoner without his consent prior to the termination
of his sentence. After such a pardon, moreover, his sentence could be
considered to have "expired," enabling the government to deport him under
the statutory provision applying in Verigin's case. Since the Supreme Court
decision would bind all lower courts throughout Canada, had it been in
effect during the Halifax proceedings, Mellish would have been constrained
to decide the case against Verigin. Four months later, in Winnipeg, the
federal authorities again attempted to deport Verigin, but they were
frustrated this time because the local court found that, whatever statutory
provisions might apply, there had not been a "fair hearing." The government
certainly seemed determined to get rid of the Doukhobor leader.
Because Makaroff was not a member of the Nova Scotia Bar, he had to engage
two Halifax agents, J.J. Power, K.C., and Lionel Ryan, to present his
client's case in the local forum. He had dictated some of the affidavits
over the telephone to them while en route to Halifax, and had planned much
of the legal strategy. By agreement, Power was to have received a fee of
five hundred dollars, but when the case was won he increased the amount,
having Verigin arrested for debt under the archaic law of capias (used in
England in Dickens' time to send indigents to debtors' prison) so that he
would not abscond without settling accounts. Verigin perceived things
differently. "God, through the instrumentality of Judge Mellish, released me
from jail, only to be re-arrested and lodged back in jail by my own lawyer,
Peter Makaroff. Send me $10,000 immediately in order to extricate me from
the toils of the law again." On learning that his ruse was detected, Verigin
began railing once more. Makaroff then left town, catching up with Verigin
in Winnipeg where the latter apologized to him.
Reflecting wryly about the case some years later, Makaroff recalled that he
had received his appointment as King's Counsel in 1932 from the Anderson
government in part for his efforts at quelling some of the more rambunctious
antics of the Sons of Freedom Doukhobors. His victory in Halifax spoke well
of the solicitude of the Canadian justice system for a member of an unpoular
minority. Nevertheless, he sometimes wondered what Anderson and Bennett
really thought about his return of Verigin to the province in 1933. He was
able to see the comic as well as the more serious aspects of the
transcontinental chase involving one of the world's most colorful religious
personalities. Because of the high drama of the incident, it attracted much
interest in the international press.
Another series of trials of roughly the same vintage, in which Makaroff
served as defence counsel, occurred after the Regina riot of 1 July 1935.
The riot was the culminating episode of the On-to-Ottawa trek by a trainload
of unemployed young men proceeding to the national capital to seek the help
of the Conservative prime minister. When R.B. Bennett ordered the trek
halted at Regina, the RCMP attempted to clear the trekkers out of Market
Square, resulting in an ugly confrontation and a clash between the police
and the militants with one death, much loss of property and many injuries.
In the climate of antagonism towards "political agitators" in mid-Depression
times, public sympathy was clearly on the side of "law and order." When the
trekkers were put individually on trial, Makaroff was called in as defence
counsel, later enlisting Emmett M. Hall, Q.C., of Saskatoon (a future
Supreme Court of Canada judge) to assist with the defence. Makaroff’s
assessment of the accuseds' prospects was bleak: "The whole atmosphere was
charged with hostility against the prisoners and there was slight hope of
freeing any of them. Nevertheless, we fought every case all the way as they
came up." Hall later said that he and Makaroff "were pretty well isolated as
far as the Regina Bar was concerned."
 |
|
Chaos during the Regina
Riot, 1935. City of Regina Photograph Collection. |
The legal combination of Democratic Socialist and Red Tory did all they
could, however, for their beleaguered and unpopular clients. Makaroff was
threatened with contempt-of-court on several occasions by the presiding
judge, Mr. Justice J.F.L. Embury, when he compared the climactic assembly of
trekkers in Market Square to discuss their survival with a meeting of bank
directors. "Who do you think would be on trial today," he typically asked
the juries, "if the police violently and without any warning broke into a
bank boardroom and clobbered the heads of the directors as they did the
trekkers on trial before you?" This invocation of the spectre of class
warfare and the solicitude of the police and courts for the property-owning
elite, of course, was more likely to appeal to a Marxist seminar than to a
right-wing judge and jurors apprehensive for their lives and property. Most
of the trekkers received sentences in Prince Albert provincial jail, and
many of them frankly welcomed the prospect of regular meals and
accommodation, however meagre, over looking for non-existent jobs on the
outside.
Coming from a Doukhobor background with its communal ethic of mutual help
and sharing, especially in times of economic adversity, it is understandable
that Makaroff would be attracted to the more radical wing of the Progressive
party in the 1920s and to the Farmer-Labour, CCF and NDP parties in later
decades. He did not agree with every policy of these left-leaning movements,
however, and as a pacifist supported CCF leader, J.S. Woodsworth, in his
opposition to Canada's participation in war in 1939, a position that the
mainstream CCF rejected. In one ofWoodsworth's letters to Makaroff
coinciding with the onset of the Second World War, the CCF leader enclosed a
copy of the United College perodical, Vox, with an article by him containing
a sentiment they would both share: "For me the teachings of Jesus are
absolutely irreconcilable with the advocacy of war." Peter disdained alike
fascism and Communism, but manifested on the international plane a Tolstoyan
stance of non-resistance to evil.
Peter's first foray into politics was as a Farmer-Labour candidate in the
Shellbrook constituency in the Saskatchewan provincial election of 1934.
When such a staunch Conservative as North Battleford lawyer Ariel F. Sallows
wrote to congratulate him on his nomination, adding that if he were beaten
he hoped it would be by a Tory, Makaroff replied, "if my defeat is dependent
on the realization of your hope, then I am as good as elected." He was
prescient in this case, since although he lost to a Liberal, he secured many
more votes than his Conservative opponent. In this mid-Depression election
he unavailingly trained his guns on the bankers and financial magnates who
were impoverishing ordinary people by imposing extortionate interest rates
and foreclosing mortgages, declaring that there was no difference between
the two older parties which always supported the economic establishment.
Makaroff’s only successful campaign for public office resulted in his single
term on Saskatoon City Council in 1939-1940. Here, as always, he stressed
the need for helping the less privileged sector of society. In a
multilingual community having many immigrant families of Central and East
European origin, he told Council that something should be done to amend the
Old Age Pensions Act, which debarred those not speaking English or French
from receiving pensions - thirteen such persons were on local relief rolls,
he added. There was also an animated exchange between him and other aldermen
when Council voted to abolish the Clothing Relief Bureau which supplied used
clothing to those in need. One applicant, Makaroff said, was refused
suitable clothing by the Bureau in which to bury his wife. He could wrap a
scarf around her neck, he was told by the Bureau official, and in an
enclosed coffin it was not necessary to have anything below that. "If that
conversation took place it's awful." Alderman Caswell expostulated. "I don't
think it took place." City Commissioner Andrew Leslie replied. "Well the
woman was buried today," said Makaroff, "and I can get an affidavit from the
man any day I want it."
Of overriding concern to Doukhobors, Mennonites, and pacifists generally was
Prime Minister Mackenzie King's national plebiscite on 27 April 1942 in
which he sought to be released from his pre-war pledge not to impose
conscription on Canadians for compulsory overseas service. While Makaroff
did not play a prominent part in the plebiscite debate, he used whatever
influence he had on the "no" side. The plebiscite resulted in a lopsided
71.2 per cent majority in Quebec against releasing King from his
undertaking, but in an over all Canadian majority of 63.7 per cent in favour
of doing so. In Saskatoon, for example, where the pro-conscription vote was
considerably higher than the national average, the "yes" majority amounted
to 88.9 per cent of those voting. Accordingly, the ever-wary prime minister
did nothing for two further years, and when his government finally did
impose conscription for overseas service in 1944, it precipitated a national
crisis. It is of some interest that in the Saskatoon region, where Makaroff
s activities were centred, former University President Walter C. Murray was
campaign chairman on the "yes" side, and Dean Fred Cronkite of the law
school was a zone chairman.
An important wartime activity of Makaroff was advising Doukhobors on the
intricacies of the National War Services Regulations, 1940 and similar laws
and regulations. Since the Doukhobors had come to Canada originally under
the Order-in-Council of 6 December 1898, exempting them from military
service, they appeared prima facie not to be subject to the above
Regulations. However, the matter was not entirely free from doubt. While
section 18(1) of the Regulations exempted those professing "conscientious
objections" for religious reasons, the onus fell on whomever claimed the
benefit of the clause to provide their eligibility. Because Doukhobors were
not expressly exempted from service in the Regulations, Makaroff had doubts
about whether or not it applied, and told those asking, "... to be perfectly
sure my advice is to comply with this provision of the act." The Deputy
Minister of National War Services, T.C. Davis, who conferred often with
Makaroff, emphasized that to be eligible for exemption as a Doukhobor an
applicant should be either a person referred to in the Order-in-Council of
1898, or the descendant of such a person; because of the Doukhobors'
objection to swearing oaths, however, an unsworn declaration in their case
would be acceptable. A Doukhobor dentist from Canora was concerned about how
his claim for exemption would be perceived: "If I register with the
Doukhobors, as I know I should, will it not affect my professional
position?" An engineer wondered about whether he was technically a British
subject. Makaroff had many queries to answer.
A poignant sidelight is offered in a post-war letter that Makaroff addressed
to conscientious objectors in the Rosthern federal by-election of 1948, when
he ran as a CCF candidate:
|
"No doubt you still have a very clear memory of your unhappy days in the
conscientious objector camp at Waskesiu during the last War. If so you will
remember my son Robert who spent the winter and part of the summer there
with you. Robert has since finished his medical course and is now a doctor
at University Hospital in Edmonton, where he graduated about eighteen months
ago." |
The letter emphasized the need for preventing another global war in the era
of atomic weapons. Both Makaroff’s son, Robert, and daughter, Barbara, later
developed flourishing medical practices.
In the wartime election of 26 March 1940, Makaroff was a CCF candidate in
the federal riding of Rosthern, where there was a large Mennonite
population, but he lost to Liberal Walter Tucker. Among speakers supporting
him were University of Saskatchewan English professor and party activist,
Carlyle King, and M.J. Coldwell, who in 1942 was to become leader of the CCF.
Although Woodsworth was re-elected in Winnipeg North Centre in 1940, those
who shared the pacifist sentiments of their ailing leader were rapidly
losing ground and on 20 July 1940, Makaroff sent a letter to the provincial
CCF convention in Regina resigning as the First Vice-President of the
provincial party because he disagreed with the party's endorsement of the
war: "... By conviction I am a lifelong pacifist." he said, "From childhood
I have been steeped in the faith that it was against the will and example of
the Prince of Peace for man to engage in the wholesale slaughter of his
fellow man, including helpless innocent children, at the command of a
superior officer."
 |
|
Doukhobor Conscientious
Objectors' camp at Montreal Lake, Saskatchewan, 1941.
Saskatchewan Archives
Board, S-B5475. |
Although the rank-and-file of the party strongly endorsed
the war effort, there was considerable understanding for Woodsworth's and
Makaroff’s pacifist position, and reconciliation when he again ran
unsuccessfully in Rosthern in the 1948 by-election. He attributed his loss
in the 1948 contest to Prince Albert merchant and farmer, W.A. Boucher, to
"insufficient time and effort on my part;" other factors were poor
organization and distribution of literature with the result that "at least
six meetings were complete flops or had to be cancelled altogether." He also
charged that Liberals such as Jimmy Gardiner or Walter Tucker (who was
vacating the Rosthern seat to become provincial Liberal leader) were
intimidating voters by threatening to cut off family allowances and crop
failure bonuses if Makaroff won. Overall, Makaroff’s record in the electoral
arena was not good, but he often had to fight against the tide in difficult
constituencies and he never seemed reluctant to undertake an uphill battle.
Makaroff was heartened in 1944 by the election of Tommy Douglas of the CCF
as Premier of Saskatchewan and by the new government's promotion of an array
of social services including hospital insurance. Peter was an active
proponent of publicly-funded medicine which he advocated in an article in
the local newspaper: "It is obvious that individual or group insurance is
not the answer for Saskatchewan to this urgent and perplexing problem, since
nearly one-half of our people are penniless on attaining the age of
sixty-five and the average family's income is probably lower today than it
was in 1936 when it was $577." Makaroff strongly approved of Saskatchewan's
pioneering efforts in this area, including Canada's first medicare plan as
implemented by the governments of T.C. Douglas and Woodrow Lloyd in
1961-1962.
Peter's appointment to the University's Board of Governors after the War was
strenuously opposed by the Imperial Order Daughters of the Empire, a
resolution of which sharply criticized him as being "widely known throughout
Saskatchewan for extreme pacifist views and for opposition to Canada's
active participation in the war." The same resolution criticized his son
Robert for seeking military exemption. Another of Makaroff’s appointments
was as chairman of the Saskatchewan Labour Relations Board in which
capacity he presided with ability over the Board for more than a decade,
having served as counsel at first instance for employees claiming to have
been wrongfully dismissed in the celebrated John East case, which
established that the provincially-appointed Board was not usurping the
functions of a superior court and was validly constituted.
In 1948 when the Judicial Committee in London was still Canada's highest
court, Makaroff represented Saskatchewan in an appeal in England challenging
the CPR's exemption from taxation within provincial boundaries. The
provincial argument was, in part, that the constitutional incapacity to tax
detracted from the postulated equality of the provinces, but Their Lordships
decided against the province, finding that there was no paradigm of exact
provincial equality in the Canadian Constitution. Was it purely fortuitous
that the Canadian Parliament abolished overseas appeals in the following
year?
 |
|
Peter Makaroff addresses
crowd at the dedication of Petrofka Ferry as a Saskatchewan Historic Site, 1959.
Photo courtesy Koozma J. Tarasoff. |
Throughout the 1950s Makaroff continued his extensive law practice as the
Sons of Freedom Doukhobors, particularly in British Columbia, carried on
their protests against various government measures. At the climax of one
series of demonstrations in 1962, Independent Liberal Senator Donald Cameron
suggested that the B.C. Sons of Freedom be placed on a reservation on one of
the Queen Charlotte Islands and provided with vocational and agricultural
training "to rescue them from their maladjustment." In replying to Senator
Cameron, Makaroff objected to his description of the Sons of Freedom as
Doukhobors—"they have nothing to do with the Doukhobor faith," but showed
otherwise keen interest in his proposal. "Your thought that with suitable
help and encouragement they might be established somewhere as a
self-supporting community to live decently and in peace on some island," he
wrote the legislator, "or say, in the Peace River Region, accords with my
views and deserves, I feel, a most serious consideration by the authorities
concerned." Since the Senator's appointment was from Alberta, there could
have been some irony in Makaroff’s suggestion that the Sons of Freedom be
settled in the Peace River district.
When Roger Carter was one of the younger partners in Makaroff’s firm he
recalls an occasion during which the latter was arguing a difficult case
before Mr. Justice C.S. Davis in Prince Albert, and was ordered by the judge
to desist
from broaching a certain matter which Makaroff considered to be crucial.
When he persisted, nevertheless, he was fined $500 for contempt-of-court by
Davis, whereupon he reached for his wallet in his back pocket, asking the
judge whether he wanted the amount "in cash or in kind" The incident
occurred during Diefenbaker's term of office as prime minister, and when his
fellow law student of thirty-five years ago called at the prime minister's
railway carriage, Diefenbaker noticeably warmed to Peter when he learned of
what had happened earlier in the day. Diefenbaker and Davis were old foes,
once having had a roundhouse fight in the Prince Albert court house.
In the early 1960s the style of Peter's firm was Makaroff, Carter, Surtees
and Sherstobitoff, but his partners, while maintaining their highest regard
for him, gradually left for other pursuits. Carter went on to a
professorship at the law school in Saskatoon, taking graduate work at
Michigan and serving as Dean of Law from 1968 to 1974. Carter was also a
founder of the University's Native Law Centre in 1973, receiving an honorary
doctorate from Queen's in recognition of this accomplishment. Another
colleague, Leslie A. Surtees, left to become a magistrate in Swift Current.
Nicholas Sherstobitoff remained with the firm longer, and after an extensive
practice in labour and administrative law was appointed to the Saskatchewan
Court of Appeal in the early 1980s, becoming the highest ranking Doukhobor
on any Canadian court. Like Makaroff, he had also presided earlier over the
Saskatchewan Labour Relations Board.
Until his death in 1971, true to his Doukhobor principles, Makaroff sought
to promote international peace and goodwill through his membership in
organizations like the World Federalists. He strongly supported Bill
Sherstobitoff (the father of the above judge) when he sent a telegram on 19
May 1963, on behalf of the Doukhobor Society of Saskatoon, urging the
Canadian government and parliamentarians not to acquire nuclear weapons. The
Pearson government had changed its position in this issue, and later in the
year did accept Bomarc missiles at RCAF bases at North Bay, Ontario, and La
Macaza, Quebec. To the end of his life Makaroff continued to be esteemed for
his steadfast adherence to principle, sometimes at considerable personal
cost, and had the respect of many persons of goodwill who did not share
those principles.
 |
|
Peter Makaroff (far
right) attending the International Meeting for Peace at the Manitoba-North
Dakota border, 1966. Photo courtesy Koozma J. Tarasoff. |
A person of strong idealism and great intellectual vigour, Peter Makaroff
was a natural leader of the Independent Doukhobor movement. He achieved
great distinction in his chosen profession. While he was strongly committed
to traditional Doukhobor values of non-violence and brotherhood, he was not
so much inclined, perhaps, to engage in Doukhobor religious services on a
regular basis. For him the Doukhobor tradition was more something to be
lived on a day-to-day basis, and its ideals of pacifism and sharing were
also to be pursued m the political forum. He was admired by many of his
fellow Doukhobors because of his valued professional counsel and activities,
with one of his main services to his community being the rescue of Peter P.
Verigin from deportation in 1933. He also reached out into the broader
community and made friends in diverse sectors. The first Doukhobor graduate
of the provincial university, he blazed a trail that many younger members of
his religion followed later. It was very fitting that after his death in
1971 his ashes were strewn in the Petrovka area on the North Saskatchewan
River where the Makaroffs had made their first Canadian home some seven
decades earlier.
This
article originally appeared in the pages of Saskatchewan History, an
award-winning magazine dedicated to encouraging both readers and writers to
explore the province's history. Published by the Saskatchewan Archives since
1948, it is the pre-eminent source of information and narration about
Saskatchewan's unique heritage. For more information, visit
Saskatchewan History online at:
http://www.saskarchives.com/web/history.html.
|
 |