|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Quaker Visit to the Dukhobortsy, 1819
Passages by William Allen and Stephen Grellet
In 1819, two Quaker missionaries visiting Russia, William Allen and Stephen Grellet, at the suggestion of Tsar Alexander I, travelled to the Dukhobortsy living on the Molochnaya River. Both kept journals and recorded their impressions. The following accounts are reproduced from Grellet’s “Memoirs of the Life and Gospel Labours of Stephen Grellet” (Longstreth, Philadelphia, 1862) and Allen's "Life of William Allen" (Longstreth, Philadelphia, 1847). Together they are the earliest surviving descriptions by western observers of Doukhobor religious practices. They also reveal the Quaker missionaries' distress at the deep doctrinal differences they encountered with their Doukhobor hosts. Foreword and afterword by Jonathan J. Kalmakoff.
Foreword
In 1818, two members of the Society of Friends, English philanthropist William Allen (1770-1843) and French-born American evangelist Stephen Grellet (1773-1855) embarked on an extensive missionary tour of Europe designed to establish a network of correspondents "who have at heart the promotion of real vital religion...". They visited most countries and were respectfully granted meetings with many rulers and dignitaries with whom they discussed their Quaker beliefs.
In November of 1818 Allen and Grellet arrived in St. Petersburg, Russia where they met with prominent members of the Russian nobility. In February of 1819, they had an audience with Tsar Alexander I whom they first met in London in 1814, at which time he showed a great interest in the Quaker faith. The Tsar warmly recalled their previous meeting "saying that this meeting provided for him cheer and firmness of spirit..." When the Quakers informed Alexander of their intention to tour parts of the Russian Empire, the Tsar observed that they "should be pleased with some of the people (i.e. sectarians) in the South...."
Allen and Grellet travelled to southern Russia in the spring of 1819. In Tavria province, the Quakers first visited the Mennonite village of Altona. From there, on May 29 and 30, 1819, they journeyed about five versts (an Imperial Russian unit of measure equal to 1.0668 km) to the Doukhobor village of Terpeniye, accompanied by German-born Superintendent of the Tavria Colonies, Samuel Contenius (1749-1830) and their Mennonite host. In Terpeniye, the visitors were conducted to the Sirotsky Dom (Orphan's Home) where they met with a group of several Doukhobors. They recorded the following accounts of their visit.
William Allen's Account
In the evening, Contenius and our host accompanied us a distance of about five versts to Terpeniye, a village where there is a settlement of one of the sects of the Dukhobortsy. We crossed the Molochnaya river, and on our arrival, were conducted to the house where they are in the practice of meeting on public occasions, and where we found several of the fraternity. They were well dressed according to the custom of the country, but there was something in their countenances which I did not quite like.
We had some conversation through Contenius, and informed them that we had heard in England of the persecution they had endured, and also of the humane interposition of the Emperor, on their behalf, - that while we had felt sympathy with them in their sufferings, we wished to know from themselves what were their religious principles. It soon appeared, however, that they have no fixed principles; there was a studied evasion in their answers, and though they readily quoted texts, it is plain they do not acknowledge the authority of scripture, and have some very erroneous notions. I was anxious to ascertain their belief respecting our Saviour, but could learn nothing satisfactory.
Stephen endeavoured, through Contenius, to
convince them of their errors on some points, but they appear in a very dark
state; they have driven out from among them, all those persons called
Dukhobortsy, who receive scriptural truth, and who are of the class with whom
we were so much pleased at Ekaterinoslav. My spirit was greatly affected,
and I came away from them much depressed.
Stephen Grellet's Account
29th of Fifth month. This afternoon we went to
the principal village of the Dukhobortsy; they inhabit several others near.
We went to the abode of the chief man among them. He is ninety years old,
nearly blind, but very active in body and mind. He appears to be a robust,
strong man. Fourteen others of their elders or chief men were with him. We
had a long conference with them. He was the chief speaker. We found him very
evasive in several of his answers to our inquiries.
First-day, 30th. I had a sleepless night; my mind being under great weight
of exercise for the Dukhobortsy. I felt much for these people, thus darkened
by their leaders, and I did not apprehend that I should stand acquitted in
the Divine sight, without seeking for an opportunity to expostulate with
them, and to proclaim that salvation which comes by Jesus Christ. It
appeared best to go back to their village, and see what opportunity the Lord
would open for it, after their meeting, whilst they are all congregated. My
dear Allen and Contenius felt very tenderly with me on the occasion. We rode
again to their village in the morning; having previously appointed a meeting
here among the Mennonites to be held in the afternoon.
Afterword
Allen and Grellet arrived in the village of Terpeniye the evening of May 29, 1819. A religious colloquy took place between the Quakers and the Doukhobors, during which the latter were asked to expound on their religious principles. The colloquy, which at times became more of a dispute, touched on the authority of Scripture, divinity of Christ, Doukhobor worship services and marriage rites. Allen and Grellet then returned to Altona for the night. They returned the following morning of May 30, 1819 and attended a moleniye (prayer service) which they dutifully described. The Quakers then attempted some “gospel labour” but the Doukhobors proved unresponsive to the missionaries’ entreaties. Allen and Grellet again returned to Altona “with heavy hearts”.
Remarkably, the names of the
Doukhobors whom Allen and Grellet met with and held religious debate have
been preserved in historical records. In Orest Markovich Novitsky's classic
work, Dukhobortsy: ikh istoriia i verouchenie (Kiev: Universitetskaia
tip., 1882), widely regarded as the most substantial and comprehensive
treatment of Doukhobor history in the nineteenth century, it is recorded
that the Quakers met with those Doukhobors held to be the "main teachers"
and "mentors" in their colony. Their names are recorded by Novitsky as
follows: from Terpeniye - Vasily Kalmykov, the son of Kapustin,
Aleksander Krylov, Matvey Kuchaev, Grigory Malen'kov, Kirill Kolesnikov,
Ivan Barbin, Fatei Zhikharev, Sergei Sukharev, Grigory Remez, Nikolai
Zakharov and Stepan Tikhonov; from Goreloye - Abrosim Tomilin,
Gavriil Sorokin, Ivan Ostryakov, Trofim Kalmykov and Ivlii Kudrin; from
Orekhov (or Rodionovka) - Semeyon Perepelkin and his son Ivan;
from Bogdanovka -Yakov Peregudov; from Kirilovka - Timofei
Khudyakov and his son Ivlii, and Ivan Ishchenkov; from Troitskoye -
Mikhail Bezlepkin, Mikhail Stroev; and in Spasskoye - Abram
Samoylov. According to Novitsky, the discussion between the Quakers
and Doukhobors was dominated by Grigory Malen'kov and Grigory Remez, who
willingly joined in the religious debate, which lasted as much as half a
day, and whose responses to the Quakers' questions "did honour to the most
clever sophist". The revered Doukhobor leader Savely Kapustin was not
himself present at the debate, as he was then in hiding from Tsarist
authorities.
In any case, the visit proved to be deeply disappointing for Allen and Grellet. They
found the Doukhobors to be “very evasive” in several of their replies to
their inquiries. What the Quakers did not take sufficiently into account,
however, was the intensity of persecution that had made the Doukhobors
evolve evasion as a means of dealing with the authorities or with passing
strangers. On some points, however, the Doukhobors made no attempt to
conceal their religious views. They “stated unequivocally” that they denied
the divine authority of the Scriptures and looked upon Christ in no other
light than as a good man; views which scandalized the evangelical-based
Quakers. Moreover, the Quakers, whose own worship services were
characterized by strict silence and solemnity, were prudishly upset by the
lack of "seriousness" they observed at the Doukhobor moleniye and by the
rounds of bowing and kissing which they found “painful to watch”. Overall,
the Quakers’ disapproval of the Doukhobor variety of folk Christianity
implies a certain intolerance and insensitivity, tinged with religious
bigotry.
View Tavria Doukhobor Villages, 1802-1845 in a larger map The visit of Allen and Grellet to the Molochnaya, while painfully depressing for the Quakers, was to become for the Doukhobors a fondly memorable event. Eighty years later, during the voyage to their new Canadian home in 1899, a group of Doukhobors gathered in the cabin of a steamship and spoke warmly with appreciation of the Allen and Grellet visit to Joseph Elkinton, an American Quaker assisting in their migration to Canada. Interestingly, the Doukhobors told of a prophecy, purportedly from Grellet, which foretold of their persecution, exile and final deliverance to a foreign country “among a people of a different language.” There, the prophecy continued, the Doukhobors would prosper and be visited by members of the Quaker brotherhood. While the prophecy is no doubt apocryphal, it demonstrates the spiritual significance which the Allen and Grellet visit acquired among Doukhobors over the years that followed.
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||